Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Macro at Bukit Batok Nature Park

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toa Payoh
    Posts
    1,527
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    53
    Country
    Singapore

    Macro at Bukit Batok Nature Park

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Hi,
    Went macro shoot on 15 Nov 08 at Bukit Batok Nature Park.
    Here's a few shots. All using 20D, 100mm Macro lens with 1.4TC and 36mm extension tube. The whether was cloudy and sky was a grey.
    Branded Imperial. ISO800 f5.6 SS1/80

    Skipper. ISO800 SS1/80 f2.8

    c&c welcomed
    ******
    Richard
    ******
    Canon 20D 100mm Macro EF-S 18-55mm EF-S 55-250mm EF-400mm f5.6 Speedlite 550EX 2x420EX ST-E2
    http://www.trident.smugmug.com/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Somewhere on a tiny Island call Sillypore
    Posts
    2,603
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    351
    Country
    Singapore
    Is the distortion of the branded imperial wing caused by the extension tube or the angle of the butterfly?
    Eugene (^_^)
    De Dwergcichlide Fanatiek
    Now swimming: Plecos and Apistogrammas

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    9,210
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    371
    Country
    Singapore
    Will would be nice if parts of the subject isn't cropped off. However, spot on focus, you need to take note of the OOF wingtip

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toa Payoh
    Posts
    1,527
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    53
    Country
    Singapore
    Eugene, Simon,
    I think the oof at the wing tip is partly caused by the big aperture and the ET.
    Don't mean to crop off the wing tip but because of the ET I can't move back, I am at the maximum focusing distant.
    ******
    Richard
    ******
    Canon 20D 100mm Macro EF-S 18-55mm EF-S 55-250mm EF-400mm f5.6 Speedlite 550EX 2x420EX ST-E2
    http://www.trident.smugmug.com/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    9,210
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    371
    Country
    Singapore
    IMO, you don't really need the extension tube for butterflies except for the smaller species. It reduces light by 1 stop, could have used that to lower your aperture.

    Suggest using minimum f8 for butterfly, but if you align yourself correctly, even larger aperture (lower than f5.6) is possible. Hence, I don't think it is due to neither your Aperture or your extension tube

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toa Payoh
    Posts
    1,527
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    53
    Country
    Singapore
    Simon,
    You are right, don't need the ET for the butterfly.Just that after shooting a spider I spotted the butterfly and didn't have time to remove it. Just manage a few shots before it flew off.
    Thanks.
    ******
    Richard
    ******
    Canon 20D 100mm Macro EF-S 18-55mm EF-S 55-250mm EF-400mm f5.6 Speedlite 550EX 2x420EX ST-E2
    http://www.trident.smugmug.com/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern Singapore
    Posts
    1,380
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    42
    Country
    Malaysia
    Richard,
    Nice shots. I think the nits are covered. One thing I learn about macro and ET/TC is always remove it after shooting a subject. I.e. after shooting your spiders, remove your ET. Only put it on again when you need it. These are extra stuff that you wouldn't want to carry around unnecessarily. That way, you won't forget to remove it or won't run into problems like didn't have time to remove.
    - Luenny

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •