Dennis,
Your advice for Kenny was irresponsible, IMHO.
Why?
You have no idea what pathogenic organisms were in that tank that you treated for only 3 days. Since that is barely enough time to kill even the more susceptible members of many genera, it surely left behind a nice collection of those individual bugs most resistant to erythromycin. IT ISN'T THE BGA THAT BECOMES IMMUNE!
You may have killed all of the BGA (not likely, BTW), but what about the Pseudomonas and Staph and Strep that are often present in aquarium water? Unless you have complete knowledge of what is in the water, don't even think of using an antibiotic useful for treating human diseases. If you do have the knowledge, then treat long enough to fully kill all the potentially harmful organisms, and not just to reduce the BGA. [That full treatment is often 10 days to 2 weeks at full strength.]
Once you have treated BGA as you advise, you have done absolutely nothing to correct the nutrient imbalance that allowed the outbreak in the first place. Invariably, it comes back and often much worse than the first time.
Sorry if I come off sounding like a crank on this subject. I feel individual responsibility and understanding a process are important in protecting all of us from "melting flesh" infections with no cure left. Prescription laws are not much good (often doing more harm). They were applied to erythromycin, just for the reasons I gave above. Your advice is why they fail.
Sermon Mode <OFF>
Wright
01 760 872-3995
805 Valley West Circle
Bishop, CA 93514 USA
Bookmarks