Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: How to dose PMDD

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Jurong East
    Posts
    33
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    15
    Country
    Singapore

    How to dose PMDD

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Hi, i just started reading abt PMDD but got confused in how to dose. Lets say that my tank is 100L, so to acheive 0.1ppm of Fe, i need to dose 10mg of Fe is it?

    Dr Mallick LushGrow-Micros comes in a 120ml bottle, it state 21,253mg/L of Fe. So 1ml of tis solution would give mi 21.253mg of Fe?

    so to achieve 0.1ppm Fe in 100L tanks, i need around 1/2ml of solution?
    Please correct mi on any mistakes. Thanks a lot.[:]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    257
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Malaysia
    ----------------
    On 8/9/2003 8:20:12 PM

    Hi, i just started reading abt PMDD but got confused in how to dose. Lets say that my tank is 100L, so to acheive 0.1ppm of Fe, i need to dose 10mg of Fe is it?

    Dr Mallick LushGrow-Micros comes in a 120ml bottle, it state 21,253mg/L of Fe. So 1ml of tis solution would give mi 21.253mg of Fe?

    so to achieve 0.1ppm Fe in 100L tanks, i need around 1/2ml of solution?
    Please correct mi on any mistakes. Thanks a lot.[:]
    ----------------
    1ml contains 21.253mg of Fe. If you pour 1ml of the solution into your 100L tank, the concentration would be 21.253/100 = 0.21253mg/L (ppm). So if you want to achieve 0.1ppm you should pour only half ml of the solution. Yes. I think you are right!

    For precise measurement in ml, you may use a medicine dropper available at Apex or Guardian. Accuracy up to 0.01ml. Only cost you $2 plus.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Jurong East
    Posts
    33
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    15
    Country
    Singapore
    I also asked this question at other forums and someone gave mi tis ans
    Quote:

    From the specs, they are using Fe-EDTA, which contains 13% chelated iron.

    1. You need to convert mg/L to g/L, and that gives you 21.253 g/L.
    2. Multiply the above value by 13%, which gives you 2.76289 g/L of Fe.
    3. Therefore, 1ml of this solution in a 100 litre tank will gives you [(2.76289g/L)*(1000mg/g)]*[(1ml)*(l/1000ml)]/(100l) = 0.02763 ppm



    so which is correct?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Singapore (CCK)
    Posts
    1,069
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    0.02763 is correct.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Jurong East
    Posts
    33
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    15
    Country
    Singapore
    Thanks . Another question, are other elements like Mn in EDTA form too? Do i use the same method to calculate?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    4,088
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    You don't need to be anal with Fe/traces.....as long as the other stuff like light, CO2, N, P and K are in good range especially N and CO2, you can dose more traces to find the limit in which there would be no improvement to plant growth if more is added.
    Plant Physiology by Taiz and Zeiger

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bedok North, Singapore
    Posts
    471
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore
    ----------------
    On 8/14/2003 9:19:22 PM

    I also asked this question at other forums and someone gave mi tis ans
    Quote:

    From the specs, they are using Fe-EDTA, which contains 13% chelated iron.

    1. You need to convert mg/L to g/L, and that gives you 21.253 g/L.
    2. Multiply the above value by 13%, which gives you 2.76289 g/L of Fe.
    3. Therefore, 1ml of this solution in a 100 litre tank will gives you [(2.76289g/L)*(1000mg/g)]*[(1ml)*(l/1000ml)]/(100l) = 0.02763 ppm

    so which is correct?
    ----------------

    I need to seek opinion from all.
    I too have the above question, and I email Dr Mallick to ask about the Fe content on both Lushgro AQUA and Micros, is it 1.683g/l (21.253g/l for Micro) effective Fe or 0.13x1.683g/l?

    And this is what he answer
    Quote:
    --------------------------
    Dear Eric

    Thanks for your mail dt 8 Sep 2003 19:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
    reg LUSHGro AQUA and MICROS

    Thanks for patronizing our products.

    The 'other minerals' with 'traces quantity' refers to some
    imprities that come with the processed minerals. They are
    mostly elements like Cobalt, etc... and their contents are
    almost negligible.

    Both LUSHGro AQUA contains 1.683g/litre of elemental Fe
    derived from Fe-EDTA which contains 13% Fe.

    Warmest regards

    Dr. Mallick
    -------------------------

    It sounds like the 1.683g/l is the effective Fe amount (read '1.683g/l of ELEMENTAL Fe') and we don't have to multiply it with 13% for PPM calculation.

    Can everyone agree to that or can you help to apprehen this email (I may understand it wrongly)?

    Thanks

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bedok North, Singapore
    Posts
    471
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore
    I have asked Dr Mallick for further clarification. This is what he wrote.... (conclusion: no need to multiply 0.13)

    ------------------------------------------
    Dear Eric

    Kindly refer to your e-mail dt Wed, 10 Sep 2003
    Subject: Re: About LUSHGro AQUA and MICROS
    -----------------------
    Could you please elaborate the following point?
    'LUSHGro AQUA contains 1.683g/litre of elemental Fe
    derived from Fe-EDTA which contains 13% Fe. '

    Does it mean I use 1.683g/l as full effective amount
    of Fe? and use 1.683 straight for ppm calculation?

    That means I don't have to use 0.13x1.683=0.219g/litre
    as the effective Fe?

    Some people read it as 1.683 of Fe-EDTA, to get the
    exact Fe, then become 0.13x1.683=0.219g/litre. Is this
    correct?
    -----------------------------------
    Thanks for contacting us to clarify your doubts.

    No need to multiply. The amount stated is the ACTUAL Fe
    content in the packed solution in the bottle.

    Fe-EDTA is only the source of Fe.

    LushGro-Aqua solution in the bottle contains 1.683 GRAMS /
    litre or 1683 MILLIGRAMS / litre or 1683 ppm of Fe.
    ......
    -----------------------------------------------------

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,198
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    7
    Country
    United_States
    PMDD:
    Using a trace measurement and iron as proxy with a test kit is simply plain wrong.

    PMDD has macro nutrients in it. These are far more critical to plant growth and much less problematic to test for(PO4, NO3 etc) than a funny trace metal which eludes any test kit.

    I don;t have an all in one mix. I add the macros dry and the traces I mix 500mls of H2O with 2 tablespoons of the dry CMS trace mix for a trace mix.

    The issue at hand here is what is enough bio available iron? Not much. But the issue also has another problem, iron complexes with about 20 other ions in solution. This is not including organic compounds. Hoe much is enough then? Test are influenced by these complexes.

    Testing for iron after 12 hrs often yields no iron. Maintaining any sort of residual is a lesson in futility.

    Main thing is to dose traces after everything else is in a good range, therefore dosing macro nuteient separately is wise choice and presents less math problems and chemistry errors which folks are prone to.

    Add 5mls of traces to every 80 liters of tank 2-3x a week depending on plant load, light.
    If you have low light, less than 2w/gal, try once a week.

    Add the other nutrients, like KNO3, K2SO4 etc dry.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •