Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: eBallast vs normal Ballast

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    143
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    1
    Country
    Singapore

    eBallast vs normal Ballast

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    I just want to gather some statistics - For those who have switched to using eBallast :

    1) Do you really find your lightset much cooler than what you've read on the web or expected?

    2) Does the energy-savings perform up to expectation? In other words, does your electricity bills drop by up to 40% as claimed?

    So far, what is truly apparent is the advantage in weight, but for point (1) & (2), does it really live up to expectation or is it just hype?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    440
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    13
    Country
    Singapore
    size should be the next problem, metal ballast support one tube only....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    3,938
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    54
    Country
    Singapore
    >> 1) Do you really find your lightset much cooler than what you've read on the web or expected?

    Yes. Cooler. At least not as much heat generated by the ballast.

    >> 2) Does the energy-savings perform up to expectation? In other words, does your electricity bills drop by up to 40% as claimed?

    Hard to calculate as our total electricity bill involves so many appliances at home. The air-con and fridge uses the most power.

    Where did you read 40%? Which brand of eBallast are you using?
    koah fong
    Juggler's tanks

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    143
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    1
    Country
    Singapore
    several reputable websites that are dealing with lighting equipment.
    I'm using 55W E****u PL eBallast with 55W L****a PL tube

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    3,040
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    5
    Country
    Malaysia
    the claim is meant for energy saving lamps with built-in electronic ballast. could be true if compared with incandescent lamps.

    may not have that much savings if you compare magnetic core ballast with eballast. there are some savings when you use eballast by virtue of eballast is running cooler that magnetic core ballast. cooler means less energy wasted in heating the magnetic core.
    the advantages of eballast are
    a) no humming sound
    b) no flickering of light during startup
    c) runs cooler
    thomas liew

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    109
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    I'm using T5 & eballast as well. Cooler definitely! Energy saving, can't tell.

    One other "hear-say" fact is lamp life lasts longer since there is no flickering during startup. Can anyone confirm this?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    港脚
    Posts
    577
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore
    Based on some document I read from Philips. Yes. Its true that e-ballast is recommended for T5.

    Cheers
    JC

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •