Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: PL or FL Light good for plants

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    spore
    Posts
    12
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

    PL or FL Light good for plants

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Hi guys,
    Is PL or FL better for plants?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    536
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    13
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by fishy_23
    Hi guys,
    Is PL or FL better for plants?

    It's the color temperature of the lights. Normal PL will have sufficient color temp. For FL, must look for those that reccomended for plant, normal household FL tube will not benefit the plant.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    462
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    104
    Country
    Singapore
    Not true.
    PL and FL different in the tube design and light intensity but you can get same color temperature for both type.
    FL there are the T8 (normal 'shop light') and the newer T5 (and few other not so common size) T5 is smaller diameter, more compact hence higher intensity than T8. PL is U shape.
    Compare normal FL (T with PL, PL can have more wattage & lumen than FL of the same length.
    Example, a 18W FL T8 length is about the same as a 36W PL.
    For light color (temperature), commercial avilable are 3000K (warm white), 4000K (cool white) and 6500K (Cool Daylight).

    In fact I just learnt that Osram has come out 7 color temperature available :
    SKYWHITE (8000 K), Cool Daylight (6500 K), Daylight (5000 K), Cool White (4000 K), White (3500 K), Warm White (3000 K) and INTERNA (2700 K)

    For planted tank, we normally use 6500K. (hmm, may be should make query on the new Osram 8000K as it is closer to the Amano light series ! May be cheaper....)

    PL is getting common nowsaday because of cost coming down and more available. But there are still people use FL for cost reason. For example a 2 ft tank, if you do non-CO2, 2x18W FL is good enough and very cost effective. If you do high CO2, you may need 2x36W PL.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Bt Batok Blk 116
    Posts
    347
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    1
    Country
    Singapore
    Personally, I prefer using PL lights as they are cooler in operation (less heat) if used with e-ballast. Also cheap (about $10-12 per tube) and last quite long (about 9 months).

    Also, needs to consider the type of plants and the height of the tank.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Jurong
    Posts
    4,020
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    552
    Country
    Singapore
    My take on this...

    PL - For the same length, they will provide more wattage and thus more lumens. Which is good, as it means more light is being packed into the same package... The bad side is that they are also hotter.

    FL - There are at least 3 types of FL light tubes available, T5, T8 and T12. The bigger the number, the thicker is the diameter of the tube. Common ones are T8s. The more expensive ones will be T5s, which comes in NO and HO (normal and high output). I think there is also a low output option... T5HOs are the more expensive ones as they pack more wattage and lumens in a narrower tube = space saving. These tubes are also cooler than PL lights...

    But what is more important, when choosing lights for plants are the colour temperature and spectrum. We are a little less restrained by spectrum, though.

    The 'right' colour temperature for plants should be between 6000K to 10,000K. However, some people also use 3000K tubes. The smaller the number, the more red and yellow the light will be.

    In my opinion, once you are used to seeing 8000-10,000K lights, everything else will look too yellow... So, you guessed it, I am preferring to use 8000-10,000K tubes.

    I would also opt for T5HOs if you have the extra cash. The cooler temperature and the brighter lumens sure make up for the initial investments...

    My 2 cents...
    Read me! :bigsmile: http://justikanz.blogspot.com/

    I'm crypt collecting... Starting cheap, now have Cryptocoryne beckettii, C.beckettii var petchii, C.crispatula var.balansae, C.griffithii(Melted! ), C.nurii, C.parva, C.pygmaea(Melted! ), C.tonkinensis(Melted! ), C.walkeri, C.wendtii 'Brown', C.wendtii 'Green', C.wendtii 'Green Gecko', C.wendtii 'Tropica' and Cryptocoryne x willisii

    Oh, juggling is hard work, man!...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    4,088
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    You do not need high light even if you opt for a CO2 enriched tank. More light equal to more need for nutrients and CO2 and all that means just faster growth and less room for error. You can drive things slower with less light and more room for error if you forget to dose or the CO2 dips a tad.

    Regards
    Peter Gwee
    Plant Physiology by Taiz and Zeiger

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Jurong
    Posts
    4,020
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    552
    Country
    Singapore
    Agree. You just need to provide everything else proportionally more as well if you go with T5HOs... Else, you are inviting algae to get a foothold...

    But I will prefer FLs than PLs for heat management...
    Read me! :bigsmile: http://justikanz.blogspot.com/

    I'm crypt collecting... Starting cheap, now have Cryptocoryne beckettii, C.beckettii var petchii, C.crispatula var.balansae, C.griffithii(Melted! ), C.nurii, C.parva, C.pygmaea(Melted! ), C.tonkinensis(Melted! ), C.walkeri, C.wendtii 'Brown', C.wendtii 'Green', C.wendtii 'Green Gecko', C.wendtii 'Tropica' and Cryptocoryne x willisii

    Oh, juggling is hard work, man!...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Serangoon Central
    Posts
    352
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    Hi,

    Can FL operate using E-Ballasts? Iron core Ballasts are hotter than E-Ballasts and I was wondering whether the heat load reduction using T5HOs would be negated by the Iron-core Ballast.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    i using PL light..
    PL light is always better than FL liao..

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    spore
    Posts
    12
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    thanks guys for the quick reply. Juz one more question, will Pl consume more electricity than FL?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Novena area
    Posts
    459
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    4
    Country
    Singapore
    It depends on the wattage of the tubes. It's like asking which is heavier, 1kg of bricks, or 1 kg of feathers?
    Call me Brian.

    P.S. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hougang
    Posts
    3,747
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    199
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by brianclaw
    It's like asking which is heavier, 1kg of bricks, or 1 kg of feathers?
    they are the same?
    ~ Vincent ~ Fishes calm your mind...
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/valice/





  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    3,938
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    54
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by FishFan
    Hi,

    Can FL operate using E-Ballasts? Iron core Ballasts are hotter than E-Ballasts and I was wondering whether the heat load reduction using T5HOs would be negated by the Iron-core Ballast.
    eBallast and magnetic ballast can be use interchangeably on PL or FL lighting. If you use eBallast on FL lighting, then no starter needed.
    koah fong
    Juggler's tanks

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    3,938
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    54
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by fishy_23
    thanks guys for the quick reply. Juz one more question, will Pl consume more electricity than FL?
    Should be about the same. Maybe some newer T5 are more efficient?
    But if used with eBallast will be more efficient.
    koah fong
    Juggler's tanks

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Serangoon Central
    Posts
    352
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    Hi Juggler,

    Thanks for your reply. Hope that you can entertain a few more questions.

    1. For the same wattage, am I correct to conclude that a light set-up of FL with E Ballast compared to one with PL with E Ballast would generate less heat?

    2. For a 4ft planted tank, any ballpark prices for the 2 set-ups and a comparison of their operating costs?

    3. What is the expected reduction in temp of FL lights with E Ballast compared to PL with E Ballast? 1 - 2 degrees?

    4. Any brands to recommend or LFS to visit? Off hand, I guess that NA would be a good place to start.

    Thanks!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •