Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Heard of the 20-40W per sqft rule?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Novena area
    Posts
    459
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    4
    Country
    Singapore

    Heard of the 20-40W per sqft rule?

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    I can't remember where I heard this rule from, but it makes more sense to me than the WPG(watts per gallon) rule. Has anyone else heard this rule before?
    Call me Brian.

    P.S. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    878
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coughing Hills, Singapore
    Posts
    2,586
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    56
    Country
    Malaysia
    One of the URLs mentioned in that website leads to this, which mentions using square metres instead. Interesting samplings.
    http://www.thekrib.com/Plants/Tech/Lighting/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    968
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    the guys from CAU base their setups on a 1W/L rule
    how does that stack up against this?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,169
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Images
    10
    Country
    Singapore
    1W/L would roughly translate to ~4WPG wouldn't it, since litres and gallons can be directly converted, as opposed to surface area which can't be

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    968
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by illumnae View Post
    1W/L would roughly translate to ~4WPG wouldn't it, since litres and gallons can be directly converted, as opposed to surface area which can't be
    yah i know. 1w/l about = to 4w/g
    what i meant was how does this 1w/l rule stack up against the surface area rule?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Pasir Ris
    Posts
    1,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    19
    Country
    Singapore
    I'd say 1W/L makes more sense than 40W/sqft. The latter doesn't take into account the fact that many tanks are of varying depths.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Novena area
    Posts
    459
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    4
    Country
    Singapore
    I don't get it, how does the 1W/L make more sense? Let's take an 8 inch cube as an example. This container would hold 8 litres or 2.2 gallons, so using the 1W/L rule, you'd use 8W over the tank. Using the 20-40W/SQFT you'd have a range of 8.9W(we'll round it off to 9W) to 17.8W(we'll round this off to 18W).
    Now if I were to go for a 48 x 24 x 30(H) inch tank -
    1W/L would give me - 540W.
    20-40W/SQFT - 160W - 320W.
    I'd think this would make more sense. My calculations moght be slightly off, so feel free to correct me if they are, but I hope this helps make my train of thought clearer to anyone reading this.
    Call me Brian.

    P.S. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Telok Blangah, SGP
    Posts
    10,216
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Images
    78
    Country
    Singapore
    arg confuse, how about if the depth only 6 inches or maybe 36 inches? It is still the same number of square feet but is 320W too much for 6 inches depth tank or will it enough for 3ft depth tank?
    -Robert
    Aquascaping is a marriage between Art and Farming
    My Blog: http://aquatic-art.blogspot.com/

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    968
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    yeah i get what you all mean
    confusing eh.
    i guess both rules can't really cover all aspects so we have to add in some common sense here

    i mean if your tank is 6 inches deep, the per sq feet rule obviously is gonna give you way too much wattage

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Pasir Ris
    Posts
    1,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    19
    Country
    Singapore
    hence the 1W/L rule makes more sense. Since tanks are of varying depths.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Novena area
    Posts
    459
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    4
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by lee1224 View Post
    i guess both rules can't really cover all aspects so we have to add in some common sense here
    I think this makes much more sense then all the rules put together.
    Call me Brian.

    P.S. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    968
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by brianclaw View Post
    I think this makes much more sense then all the rules put together.
    i just do an agarration of the light needed and adjust as i see how the results go
    not very cost effective but can't help it

    usually it doesnt go VERY far off anyway and i try to compensate with adjusting the lighting period instead
    better than changing lightsets every now and then!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •