Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Placement for Eheim Pro 3e 2078 inlets and outlets

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    165
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Malaysia
    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    My filtration lay-out is 1 canister (25 liters capacity) generate by 2 pumps (1150 l/h each).

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Admiralty
    Posts
    885
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore
    Removed one inlet yesterday after i found that the flow suddenly dropped. The cause was the net i put inside the cage stuck with debris (to prevent shrimps and small fishes from getting into filter). Flow increase to 60% now and both outlet slightly stronger than I was having with just one outlet from 2028, just nice for both reactor and lily pipe flow Hope this will helps those who are thinking of using pro3.
    Last edited by o2bubble; 25th Feb 2008 at 09:19.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Admiralty
    Posts
    885
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore
    Thanks for your suggestion, I thought about that as well but thinking this will not really contribute to much difference with using a T-joint as compare to the step down from 16 mm to 12 mm at each end of the outlet. Besides I wanted more flow towards the CO2 cyclo reactor, thus the straight end is to the reactor.

    Anyway, I'm quite satisfied with the current configuration in terms of flow rate. My lily pipe flow is strong enough to push water in a anti-clockwise direction gently (slight ripple on surface) and my reactor cyclo has good turbulence at the top to ensure good co2 mixing. This met the objectives I have set out to achieve in first place:

    1. Increase tank circulation
    2. Increase flow slightly in CO2 cyclo reactor
    3. Avoid using 2 filter as it takes up more space, more hoses and more maintenance to clean filter.

    In addition, I get:

    1. Higher bio-filtration
    2. Constant flow/advance filter capabilities
    3. Lily pipe to eliminate surface protein film

    In summary, it was a great investment given the cost of this upgrade is less than $300 (after sold off 202 compare to buying another small used filter with eheim substrate pro media which will cost about $150.

    Quote Originally Posted by hc rotala View Post
    Imagine that as every moments when it it comes to filter maintenance, with such lot of chores to acquire the start-up flow, how boring it be.

    Try using a "Y" type splitter instead of "T", less pressure loss so smoother the out-flow.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •