Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Raynox DCR-250 Macro Conversion Lens

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,149
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    Country
    Singapore
    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Using only G9, no filters or other stuff, only tripod but using only one leg, i guess you call monopod!

    MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!! TIME TO LAY BACK AND RELAX!
    A Journey Of A Thousand Miles Begins With A Single Step

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northern Singapore
    Posts
    1,380
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    42
    Country
    Malaysia
    Agree with Richard. That's why I say I might want to get one to stack with my 105mm macro lens - who says you cannot stack it with macro lens? And it's better than extension tube or teleconverter because for the latter 2, adding them and removing them means you need to remove your lens.

    Quote Originally Posted by trident View Post
    Maurice,
    I think they stack the Raynox to macro lens is to increase the magnification.
    It will shorten the distant between the object and the camera.
    I use extension tube with my 100mm to get better magnification too.
    - Luenny

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    港脚
    Posts
    577
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore
    I tried stacking raynox with 105mm macro lens. Imho, its not a gd combi. U need to go real close and this make it not feasible.

    Regards to vignettting, I believe 55mm should be fine. I tried raynox on my 14mm -55mm lens and ard 50mm, the vignetting is almost min.

    Cheers
    JC

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    9,210
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    371
    Country
    Singapore
    can safety say no one produces better fish photography with a G5 then our very own hwchoy with no attachment. Frankly, I think the raynox is a good piece of glass to own, however fitted on a non-macro lens, you loss on optical quality and sharpness. Nevertheless, good for the budget photographers who wants a go with macro. I wonder how this glass is, compared to the canon closeup 250d/500d, from the sound of "lossing infinite", it sound similar but how is the optical quality?

    and sorry to say, MScolor pricing isn't like before

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,149
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon View Post
    can safety say no one produces better fish photography with a G5 then our very own hwchoy with no attachment. Frankly, I think the raynox is a good piece of glass to own, however fitted on a non-macro lens, you loss on optical quality and sharpness. Nevertheless, good for the budget photographers who wants a go with macro. I wonder how this glass is, compared to the canon closeup 250d/500d, from the sound of "lossing infinite", it sound similar but how is the optical quality?

    and sorry to say, MScolor pricing isn't like before
    Oh yes, i got a friend he dont have to use tripod and can shot macro shots of dragon fly and other macro things, he has a very steady hand. Too bad he die of heart attack, left with wife and unborn child. Maybe hwchoy have a steady hand also!

    I still believe in original macro lens alone and they can really take good shots if use correctly.

    MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!! TIME TO LAY BACK AND RELAX!
    A Journey Of A Thousand Miles Begins With A Single Step

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •