Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Will undergravel filter be too weak for a 4ft tank CRS tank?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    XinJiaPo?
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

    Will undergravel filter be too weak for a 4ft CRS tank?

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Hi all, will like to seek some opinions from fellow CRS keepers regarding undergravel filter for CRS in a 4Ft tank.
    I intend to have undergravel filter connected to my ehim 2026 for my 4ft tank with the gravel plates taking up about 50% of the base(using GEX soil). Question: Are the gravel plates area too big or too small or its not even recommended to use on a 4ft tank?
    Suggestions or feedbacks please.
    Thanks alot.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Singapore/Taiwan/China
    Posts
    880
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Images
    89
    Country
    Singapore
    50% of 4ft x 1.5ft area is too much, for this base area size 25% will be good, this is my personal liking.
    silane

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    XinJiaPo?
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    Roger that. thanks alot silane.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    West
    Posts
    357
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Images
    30
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by GER View Post
    Hi all, will like to seek some opinions from fellow CRS keepers regarding undergravel filter for CRS in a 4Ft tank.
    I intend to have undergravel filter connected to my ehim 2026 for my 4ft tank with the gravel plates taking up about 50% of the base(using GEX soil). Question: Are the gravel plates area too big or too small or its not even recommended to use on a 4ft tank?
    Suggestions or feedbacks please.
    Thanks alot.
    Using undergravel filtration powered by cannister have to be careful. Best to have a pre-filter to absorb the dirt/soil particles, which will enable your medias to have longer lifespan. If not you have to wash the cannister frequently.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    6
    Country
    Singapore
    Can anyone share the benefits of using a UG filter for a shrimp tank?
    Pleco and Cory Idiot Savant

    L46,L66,L333,L48,L201,L134,BN,L184,L168s and others...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Singapore/Taiwan/China
    Posts
    880
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Images
    89
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by GER View Post
    Roger that. thanks alot silane.
    You are welcome.
    silane

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    6
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by Savant View Post
    Can anyone share the benefits of using a UG filter for a shrimp tank?
    Anyone at all?
    Pleco and Cory Idiot Savant

    L46,L66,L333,L48,L201,L134,BN,L184,L168s and others...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    XinJiaPo?
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by Spid View Post
    Using undergravel filtration powered by cannister have to be careful. Best to have a pre-filter to absorb the dirt/soil particles, which will enable your medias to have longer lifespan. If not you have to wash the cannister frequently.
    Thanks for the tips spid, point noted also.

    Quote Originally Posted by Savant View Post
    Can anyone share the benefits of using a UG filter for a shrimp tank?
    hi Savant, i choose UG filter because it offer extra surface area for beneficial bacteria to live on. I feel i will need all the BB i can get so why not.
    Anyway, I'm actually following Silane's method of setting up a CRS tank at: http://www.silaneshrimp.com/articles...ank-setup.html
    Hmm...hope i do not get sue for copyrights

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    6
    Country
    Singapore
    In such a case, will a larger canister loaded with biomedia do the same thing?

    I did read Silane's thread on using UG, but did not find any understanding as to how the entire setup actually works...
    Pleco and Cory Idiot Savant

    L46,L66,L333,L48,L201,L134,BN,L184,L168s and others...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    West
    Posts
    357
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Images
    30
    Country
    Singapore
    With or without undergravel filtration is ok for shrimps. I tried air driven undergravel, hoping only to create a "plenum" effect- where denitrification takes place.

    I have tried cannister powered UG and find it troublesome to manage. Reason being cannister will be clog up often due to the break down of soil particles. If lazy to wash frequently, I guess this filtration will not works well in the long run.
    Last edited by Quixotic; 7th Oct 2008 at 00:47. Reason: Remove immediate quote

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    6
    Country
    Singapore
    Oh okay... that sounds reasonable...

    Thanks for the explanation...
    Pleco and Cory Idiot Savant

    L46,L66,L333,L48,L201,L134,BN,L184,L168s and others...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Jurong West
    Posts
    319
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Images
    2
    Country
    Singapore
    I dont see why will it clog, the dust created will not be that compact, whether you use UFG or not. Shrimps still have to dig around and create dust. For a canister to clog, it will take ages, the cross section of a canister filter is so much bigger.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    West
    Posts
    357
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Images
    30
    Country
    Singapore
    Quote Originally Posted by nasty12 View Post
    I dont see why will it clog, the dust created will not be that compact, whether you use UFG or not. Shrimps still have to dig around and create dust. For a canister to clog, it will take ages, the cross section of a canister filter is so much bigger.
    UGF powered either by motor or cannister has a high flow rate which will cause a faster break down of soil. Since soil are broken down easily, wont these particles that are being drawn into the cannister have a greater impact on the medias and thus redcing the flow rate of the cannister drastically? In the long run, if not wash frequently, clogging will occurs.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    6
    Country
    Singapore
    Yeah... I think its okay to install a UG filter so long as you do not power it with a cannister filter... It may not be necessary to draw water through the soil at such a fast rate if all you are trying to achieve is to provide additional surface for the bacteria to colonise....

    Further since these bacteria require ammonia fo feed on, you will need quite a fair bit of bioload before you can ultilise all the surface? I think I would still go ahead with loads of biohomes in a cannister filter
    Pleco and Cory Idiot Savant

    L46,L66,L333,L48,L201,L134,BN,L184,L168s and others...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    26
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Will undergravel filter be too weak for a 4ft tank CRS tank?

    Just bouncing off an idea. How about putting a layer of bio materials on top of the plate, then coarse gravel then gex soil? No cannister, pure UG filtration.

    Cheers

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    128
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Will undergravel filter be too weak for a 4ft tank CRS tank?

    I am running a tank with UGF as well. I have around 50% of the based covered with UGF. To avoid fast breakdown of soil, I had covered the UGF with a layer of netting, follow by quartz.

    The area surrounding the UGF is also protected with quartz. Soil comes after that.

    The benefit of using UGF is, shrimp's waste are sucked into the UGF and siphon out, into a canister. For normal filtration, shrimp waste are trapped in the gravel and stirring the gravel can prove fatal. Thus, with UGF, the risk are reduced or eliminated.

    Quote Originally Posted by nasty12 View Post
    I dont see why will it clog, the dust created will not be that compact, whether you use UFG or not. For a canister to clog, it will take ages, the cross section of a canister filter is so much bigger.
    With constant high velocity suction, soil will break down fast and the fine soil particles will clog the pores of your filter media. These fine soil particles will past through filter wool easily.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •