Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner

View Poll Results: Which Filter you prefer most?

Voters
384. You may not vote on this poll
  • Classic

    160 41.67%
  • Ecco

    49 12.76%
  • Pro

    35 9.11%
  • Pro2

    79 20.57%
  • Pro3

    61 15.89%
Page 26 of 46 FirstFirst ... 1622232425262728293036 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 520 of 912

Thread: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

  1. #501
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    1,739
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    Images
    1
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Quote Originally Posted by mercur1al View Post

    They are not worth much since it's fairly cheap to buy a big pack of wool and cut, but for lazy people like me who have OCD (diy cut pad needs to be as round and as identical to original pads), it makes maintaining the filter easier.

    Though now I am undecided about how many coarse filter pads to use.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    What i do is, i buy the big pack white wool and cut it slightly bigger than the tray.I will fold the side to make it a tight fit in the canister tray.
    I didn't use the blue sponge, all are whites.

  2. #502
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    273
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by zerofighterx101 View Post
    What i do is, i buy the big pack white wool and cut it slightly bigger than the tray.I will fold the side to make it a tight fit in the canister tray.
    I didn't use the blue sponge, all are whites.
    Thanks for the tip! That's what I will look to do in future.

    Just realized the white sponge I have been using all along is in fact pretty coarse as compared to the original eheim white sponge. Guess they are similar to the blue ones, just different coloured.

    Have to hunt for finer white sponge eventually I guess.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #503
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    7,120
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Yeah, the coarse sponge used for first stage mechanical filtration is usually those made out of tough nylon material and you can see through it easily... while fine filter wool is like a dense "wool" fibrous texture.

    Most people usually buy those rectangular sheets of 3rd-party brand fine white filter wool and DIY cut them to shape (i always pre-cut a stack of them for standby too), because its usually changed at every filter maintenance. Once it turns brown and clogged with dirt its impossible to effectively wash away the tiny trapped particles for re-use anyways.
    :: Urban Aquaria ::
    www.urbanaquaria.com

  4. #504
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    1,739
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    Images
    1
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    I never recycle them even though it says reusable.

  5. #505
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    186
    Feedback Score
    0

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    IMG_2609.JPG

    I just curious; for the inflow pipe(to the filter canister), does it matter if the short end is in the tank or the long end?

  6. #506
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Telok Blangah, SGP
    Posts
    10,216
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Images
    78
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Does not really matter as long as fit your need. For example, sometime there are rocks or plants under it, thus you put the short end in the tank.
    -Robert
    Aquascaping is a marriage between Art and Farming
    My Blog: http://aquatic-art.blogspot.com/

  7. #507
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    7,120
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Yeah, you can position the eheim plastic intake pipe via either end... though it is usually better to have the intake closer to the bottom of the tank to draw in more of the larger debris and sediments washed across the substrate by the flow.
    :: Urban Aquaria ::
    www.urbanaquaria.com

  8. #508
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Guys want to seek some advice.
    I'm running a 2213 for my 2ft tank with a chiller.
    it seems a tad weak but water is pretty much gushing out.
    My tank is less than half planted with co2. Small fishes of tetra gourami danion and rummy nose.
    Do I need a bigger canister? Classic 350 or economic 300?
    Best can used back all my double taps and 12/16 hose and lolly pipes.

  9. #509
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hougang
    Posts
    800
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Images
    18
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    2215 is using the same double taps for 12/16 hose
    ********
    Andrew

  10. #510
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    You reckon 2215 good enough?
    My output 1 end at the direct opposite end...my long tall grass don't move. Does that means not enough flow? Total fishes 40 to 50.

  11. #511
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    2215 equivalent will be Eco 300 and pro 300?
    But was told classic most reliable. ...how bro?

  12. #512
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    7,120
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    If the chiller is reducing overall flow and you find that more flow is required, then upgrading to an Eheim 2215 (350) would be good... it has a 620 l/ph flow rate and larger filter media volume, so it'll help improve the overall circulation and filtration.

    The Ecco Pro 300 has an even higher flow rate at 750 l/ph and comes with inbuilt taps with an easy priming system, and its more energy efficient (only uses 8 watts), but it costs more, so it just depends on your budget.

    The Classic series is considered more reliable mainly because its design is very simple (without any extra features), so there are potentially less things that could break or go faulty. I guess it depends on how careful you are at handling and maintaining the filters.
    :: Urban Aquaria ::
    www.urbanaquaria.com

  13. #513
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Thanks UA. So u reckon these models enough?
    Cos I feel is not enough now with my 2213 as leaves at the opposite side doesn't move. is that a good gauge?

  14. #514
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    7,120
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Bieffe View Post
    Thanks UA. So u reckon these models enough?
    Cos I feel is not enough now with my 2213 as leaves at the opposite side doesn't move. is that a good gauge?
    Either eheim model would be suitable... both will improve the circulation. I use an Ecco Pro 300 connected to Co2 reactor for my 2ft planted tank and the overall flow was just right, didn't need to adjust the taps.

    Whether there is enough flow and circulation in the tank would also depend on your hardscape and plant layout, and also the position of the outflow pipe. Adjusting those factors can help improve circulation too.

    Ideally most of the plants in the direction of the flow should just be swaying slightly (not too much though, just a little), but even if they don't seem to be moving, as long as you can see suspended particles floating past the plants, it can also indicate there is already sufficient flow in those areas.
    :: Urban Aquaria ::
    www.urbanaquaria.com

  15. #515
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    The power saving of ecco pro 300 vs 2215 is 8w vs 15w and the ecco has higher flow rate. However I have some concerns.
    The ecco pro canister is very small...even smaller than my 2213! So little media. The classic series can have lots of media...that's a big big plus right?
    Just worried if getting the 2215 the flow similar to 2213....then I will feel so genna plug.

  16. #516
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Got another idea..what if I add a skimmer at the 'dead' corner...just drop 2 dots of coloured medi to see flow...is moving towards the corner....then very slowly back. My inlet and outlet are side by side.

  17. #517
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    7,120
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Bieffe View Post
    The power saving of ecco pro 300 vs 2215 is 8w vs 15w and the ecco has higher flow rate. However I have some concerns.
    The ecco pro canister is very small...even smaller than my 2213! So little media. The classic series can have lots of media...that's a big big plus right?
    Just worried if getting the 2215 the flow similar to 2213....then I will feel so genna plug.
    Yeah, the Ecco Pro 300 filter media volume is similar to the 2213, while the 2215 is larger with more filter media volume (less features, more space)... so it'll just depend on whether you prefer higher flow rate + less power consumption or you prefer higher filter media volume.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bieffe View Post
    Got another idea..what if I add a skimmer at the 'dead' corner...just drop 2 dots of coloured medi to see flow...is moving towards the corner....then very slowly back. My inlet and outlet are side by side.
    Installing a surface skimmer and facing it at dead spots or lower flow areas can help, it's quite a common way to solve circulation issues and also get the benefits of removing surface oil film too.
    :: Urban Aquaria ::
    www.urbanaquaria.com

  18. #518
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    338
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Images
    3
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Hijack abit since I saw the surface skimmer bought up.

    Saw a few setups when a surface skimmer is used the inlet is opposite of the lily pipe. Instead of the same side why is that so?

  19. #519
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    I think that's to facilitate flow. Lily pipe out towards skimmer...skimmer draws water in and output 90 degrees from lily. Thus water will move about.

  20. #520
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    273
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore

    Re: Eheim Canister Filter Comparison

    Quick check with you guys running Eheim 2215 with purigen.

    Where do you place the purigen pack? Usually, it goes on top of everything, right above the white fine pad. However, the 2215 come with lattice screens, and has a fat "leg" right in the centre.



    I am using the 100ml purigen pack with the original seachem bag provided. When placed last and above the white filter pad, the "fat leg" presses into the purigen bag. Concerned if prolonged usage will cause the bag to burst. How do you guys place your purigen?

    Image from Google images.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •