
Originally Posted by
bsplenden
In the previous post, I have already understood the need for latin names. And I am very much willing to learn it.
But, the biggest problem for me is how to learn it. From websites? I have not been able to find any that properly explains the scientific names for these fishes. From books? I have been to the library, and only small sections of a book is dedicated to killies.
And can I have an explanation for one more thing? I do agree that knowing the scientific name is very much important. But is it that important for hobbyists to know what the latin names stand for? Is it not sufficient that we know the scientific name of the fish we are keeping, so that if we do sell it, we can sell it under the correct name, and that there will be no hybridising?
Thanks for taking the time to read and explain to a noob like me...
Iatfai.
Iatfai,
We are all newbies at something. I'm trying to repair a couple of bassoons and learn to play one. I find the fingering a nightmare, compared to the clarinets, saxes, etc. that I have played before.
I'd love to help reduce the confusion for you, but am not sure exactly what is causing the problem. Some folks have difficulty with pronouncing the names, but that isn't a big deal. If you have a pencil and paper handy you can always communicate that way.
You should hear the way some of our auctioneers mutilate the sounds at club and even convention auctions! 
With killifish, we usually do not include the higher-order names, such as family, but do try to have the binomial (two) names of genus and species plus a non-latinized location, with a collection code where available.
Many atlases of killifish were started before a major re-naming started, so the genus name of a fish in Baensch may have been changed more recently. Likewise, a species name may be found to be a synonym of an earlier named species, so may be changed to fit the more accepted name.
The collection code never changes (as long as bags are clearly labelled,
) but the location is a bit of a problem. Many fish in the hobby come from major shipping centers, like Monrovia, Lagos, etc. and the locations attached are essentially meaningless. The wholesalers in those places may have bought fish collected from well-known sites, but never tell us the location for fear someone will usurp their source. They are also apparently very careless about mixing females, so their fish are very poor choices for breeding stock, in most cases.
Most of us prefer to get wild fish from known collectors, so we have some chance of getting a known species from a clearly identified location. In the US, collections since 1950 have been kept by Roger Langton and published as Wild Collections of Killifish. My latest edition covers 1950-2003 and is the 4th Edition. It is available from Roger and, I think, the AKA.
A most complete discussion of the topic is covered in Jean Huber's KilliData 2000 (or newer?). He also has a web page that is kept very up to date for the dedicated subscriber. Prof. Huber is a bit more willing to accept nomenclature changes and additions than is Dr. Ken Lazara, who writes the AKA nomenclature standard, Killifish Master Index which is in a 4th edition right now (available through the AKA). The species list from KMI4 can be found at the Arizona Rivulin Keeper site ( http://ark.aka.org/AList.htm ). See the AKA affiliates list to find a whole lot of such sites at www.aka.org. Pronouncing Latin names can be found in an article in the Cincinnatti site at http://www.cincikillies.org/sayit.htm.
That last site has a lot of good articles, as do many of the affiliate sites.
HTH
Wright
01 760 872-3995
805 Valley West Circle
Bishop, CA 93514 USA
Bookmarks