
Originally Posted by
bsplenden
Hi Wright,
My problem with latin names doesn't come from the pronounciation. But I think it is more of a problem because i don't know what it stands for. Let me give an example.
Simpsonichthys fulminantis 'Guanambi' BHS 95/12
So what does "Simpsonichthys" stand for? And so on...
The name should be presented as Simpsonichtys fulminantis Guanambi BHS 95/2. The italicized (and Latinized) scientific name is followed by a location and a collection code that says it was on the 12th map site of the BHS group's 1995 collection trip. The location should not include quotes (single or double) and the scientific name is always italicized, except in ascii systems that don't allow font changes. For those, I sometimes try to make the difference clear by using the old convention of enclosing the italicized word(s) with asterisks, such as *Nothobranchius* for Nothobranchius.
Simpsonichthys is just Latin for "Simpson fish." My Latin is too limited to know exactly what fulminantis means, but I suspect it refers to the appearance of the fish, somehow. magnificus is easier, as it is a magnificent little fish. Note that the Genus is always initially capitalized, and the specific (species) name is not, even when it is an adaptation of a proper noun, like korthausae. The latter is a Notho named after Edith Korthaus, meaning Korthaus's Nothobranchius. The possessive is feminine, because Edith is a lady.

Originally Posted by
bsplenden
I have also read somewhere that the number in the scientific names states the year in which the fish was collected. But why in this case, it is 95/12? Is "12" the month in which the fish was collected?
What about Simpsonichthys magnificus 'Itacarambi B7 ' ?
While in other freshwater fishes, the scientific name of fishes more or less are in the same format. Lets use a few casual examples. Sceleropages formosus , Astronotus occelatus , Tetraodon fahaka.
See, they all have a pattern. The generic name, followed by the species name.
But in the case of killies, there are like different formats, and its so long that i have to wonder which is the generic name, which is the species name. If i am not wrong, "BHS" is the collection code. But what is the collection code?
The scientific name is in Latin and italicized, while location and collection codes are not. You tell the name of the genus by the word that has an initial capital and is in italics. The species name (and sub-species for trinomials) will be without an initial capital. The location name should never be italicized [Monrovia can be used as a species name as monroviae but should not be used in that form for the location (a common mistake).]
Many locations and collection codes are at the whim of the collector, and many collectors aren't anxious to lead tourists to a fragile site, so we do the best we can with what we can get.
That map site mentioned above may be trusted to a discreet chronicler, like Roger Langton, but probably will not be published as GPS coordinates for the general public to see.
I realize many others have answered these basic questions to some extent, but I was off playing "Election Clerk" and didn't have time to put in my bloviations until today.
A recent problem happened when I sent some eggs to Singapore with an incorrect location spelling and an older generic name. I hope the few fish that hatched get a better label than what I provided. 
Rivulus is undergoing a re-evaluation and some are being split off into new genera. What I sent were originally tagged as "Rivulus marmoratus Dandriga Belize Jan 2000." The correct location actually was Dangriga Belize, but Costa had recently reclessified them as Cryptolebias marmoratus, then found that name had been used on a fossil fish so we got to retype the labels a third time as:
Kryptolebias marmoratus Dangriga Belize Jan 2000.
Dangriga Belize is the location and I think the Jan 2000 is Bruce Turner's collection trip to Belize in January of 2000, but I'm not sure. [I leave it alone until I know it was a mistake.] Neither are a part of the scientific name, and are rarely (if ever) used by taxonomists and ichthyologists. They were added when the hobby started losing species in the '70s and '80s by inadvertent hybridization, and are mostly for the benefit of hobby breeders. OK? They are the most significant part of the name, and you will hear hobbyist/breeders at club meetings asking how those "M'bonge" are doing when asking about some Scriptaphyos the other is working with.
Most killifolk will know you are talking about Fundulopanchax walkeri GH2/74 if you just mention the "GH-2s." [Putting the year after a slash is apparently an older European convention, not used much any more. The meaning is pretty obvious, anyway.]
Wright
01 760 872-3995
805 Valley West Circle
Bishop, CA 93514 USA
Bookmarks