
Originally Posted by
keehoe
Thanks Benny, but the magnification power must be very high inorder to achieve such big and clear picture.
Technically, the lens may say "macro" but this is closer to microphotography than macrophotography, in my humble opinion. Truly great egg shots, Benny!

Originally Posted by
keehoe
I realise focusing is my real issue in taking these photo from my panasonic lumix fx7. Not sure how to configure the light metering and white balance of this baby. Seems to be all auitomatic.
The small point and shoot (P&S) cameras that do so great at the kiddies' birthday party (if shutter lags isn't too bad) are not flexible enough for the unusual lighting and focus problems of macro and micro photography of live, moving subjects. You probably need external flash, which none provide, cable release (also absent), and manual focus (few have) at a minimum.
Autofocus and fish can work, with enough light and an external flash, but otherwise will just drive you nuts.
IR remotes, for some reason I cannot understand, all only work from out right in front of the camera. Since they are mostly useful for macro and tele work, why do they think someone wants his own picture taken while pointing a remote at the camera? Give me a simple cable release (or wired shutter-release switch), any day!
A tripod with a movie-style damped pan head is really nice for reducing camera shake (the reason for 90% of "bad focus") and still letting you follow the fish a bit with a long lens. Flash avoids the need, but then a dedicated stand/tripod for the flash is a good idea. Get it well off the camera if possible. Obviously, that's difficult without either a hot shoe or PC cable connection. Neither come on most P&S cameras.
Wright
01 760 872-3995
805 Valley West Circle
Bishop, CA 93514 USA
Bookmarks