Don't keep large tanks if it's a concern.
If you have the $ for large tanks then you should be able to afford the associated water bill.
Often, there are 3 tiers on a water bill, one for normal folks without large tanks, or folks that like 30 minute showers or wash their cars once or twice a week etc etc.
As your per capita/house/apartment usage goes up, so does you rate per cubic meter/ cubic ft etc.
This is enough to deter folks from using lots of water in areas where there is little water, like CA. We'd rather give the farmers all the water here or steal entire rivers from the Sierra's to feed LA

Aww the politics of water is a really ugly place here in the USA and in much of the world. It's going to get much worse in the future.
But your concern is more a social political issue. Answering your question can take that path.
But one way you can do what you are asking about is to have numerous test kits, good ones also. You'll have to test often(weekly) and you might get away with less testing as you get a feel for the tank's ebb and flow of nutrient consumption.
I really feel if water conservation is a large concern, a non CO2 tank apporach is far more condusive. I only add water to top off for evaporation only. I change maybe 30-50% every 3-6 months.
I also use the wastewater to water my garden out front. Some folks I know even refilter their wastewater through carbon/DI beds. Some used RO and saved the wastewater from that for the garden, but you'd need room for that.
You are going to give up something if you don't plan on large water changes. $, time and testing/kits, faster growth, less guessing etc.
Sure, you can do it but there's always a trade off. Whether or not these are worth it or not may be open to debate.
Regards,
Tom Barr
Bookmarks