----------------
On 10/7/2003 2:26:56 PM
An internal filter is generally cheaper than an external one.
It will depends on your budget and application to decide what type of filter to use.
BC
----------------
Internal filters are not always cheaper than exernal cannister filters. Price is not a good basis to compare the merits and shortcomings of the different type and brand of filters.
For example, an Eheim Aquaball could easily cost as much as if not more than some of the external cannister filters on the market. To some, it's not worth the money, while others feel differently.
Also, some internal filters are better than other for specific needs. Take for example, the Attman power liquid filter F201, F202, F203 or the F101, F102, F103 filters. These internal filters very affordable, has a good flowrate (up to 2000L/hr), separate media compartment for different types of media, directional control for output. But they are probably suitable for fishes larger than 3 cm only. Otherwise, it's going to be a death trap.
Similarly, the Fluval 1 plus, 2 plus, 3 plus and 4 plus are pricy compared to the Attman, but you can easily keep small fishes such as Corydoras hastatus, pygmaeus, Boraras maculatus and Nannostomus anduzei without fear of the fishes being stuck behind the filter or the inlet.
Therefore, the size and density of the bioload in the tank will probably be a better guage of the suitability of a particular type of filter over the others, be it internal or external.
Cheers,
I have dwarf cichlids in my tanks! Do you?
Bookmarks