Advertisements
Aquatic Avenue Banner Tropica Shop Banner Fishy Business Banner
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: CO2:pressurised bubbler vs electric atomiser

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kranji
    Posts
    67
    Feedback Score
    0

    CO2:pressurised bubbler vs electric atomiser

    Advertisements
    Fresh n Marine aQuarium Banner

    Advertise here

    Advertise here
    Just acquired a "CO2 electric atomiser", where there is a block on carbon which fizzles n gives lots of tiny bubbles when turned on. Whats the difference btwn this, and the regular pressure system co2 bubbler? is the electric one better? or is it the pressured sys? coz i see that nearly EVERY planted tank uses the pressure system...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Redhill
    Posts
    2,086
    Feedback Score
    0
    Country
    Singapore
    the cost effectiveness of the gas system wins out.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kranji
    Posts
    67
    Feedback Score
    0
    cost effective? as in, i need to change the carbon block much more regularly? oh dear... how long does a pressure system last, with, lets say 500ml bottle?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    3,040
    Feedback Score
    0
    Images
    5
    Country
    Malaysia
    the carbon block requires yearly replacement and cost about $70++.
    for $70, you can refill a 5l co2 cylinder at least 3 times.
    each refill last at least half a year, depending on you tank size and bubbling rate.

    electric co2 can be used for smaller tanks only.

  5. #5

    Re:

    Don't forget to do the sums on your electrical bills too.

    An electronic atomiser will definately "eat" more electricity as compared to the soleniod regulator.

    Therefore pressured C02 is still the "cheap" alternative.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •